Why Saudi-Russia Oil War is a Game Theory Masterstroke
From a layman’s view, the ongoing Saudi-Russia oil war is a dumb move amidst the global coronavirus pandemic. But from a game theory perspective, it is a masterstroke.
Analysts have called the breakdown of Opec and the lifting of the supply cuts that kept the oil market balanced in the last two years anything from a spectacular blunder to collective suicide.
A new model developed by mean-field game theory investors, Fields Medal laureate Pierre-Louis Lions and Jean Michel Lasry, suggests otherwise.
The model shows that big low-cost oil producers such as Saudi Arabia must balance market-share aspirations and conflicting prices. Although Opec says that price stabilization is its main goal, from reality, this is far from the truth.
In the event oil prices increase, the monopoly benefits from higher revenue but loses market share to its higher-cost producers. However, the response by the other player drives up production cost which in return makes their investment inefficient.
As such, the monopoly regains control by ramping up his production and making a sharp change in prices.
It usually takes some kind of a shock to get the dominant monopoly to go into cliff mode. In the late 1990s, the catalyst was the negative demand shock of the Asian financial crisis. During the most recent oil market crash, in 2014, it was the supply shock of US shale oil. For some time, the model shows, the market had been waiting for the right signal. The coronavirus has provided it.
The steepness of the cliff is however unprecedented. The coronavirus impact is so huge that Saudi Arabia and Russia have a unique opportunity to test the limits of global storage capacity.
Source: https://energypolicy.columbia.edu/research/op-ed/saudi-russia-oil-war-game-theory-masterstroke